Every day, the way we use the internet continues to evolve. And as a result, itâs now easier for people to access their data from anywhere in the world. While this is good, this level of access has a downside. Thereâs an increasing threat to stored data. There is almost always news of accidental leaks or data breaches.
Additional precautions are required to ensure the security of data. And this is where SOC 2 compliance comes in.
Organizations that are managing data in the cloud need to be SOC 2 compliant. This will show their customers that they care about their data. And that will bring in more customers in return.
From data such as email addresses to sensitive financial information, users expect organizations to properly manage their data.
Hereâs all you need to know about SOC 2 compliance and why itâs important when choosing a SaaS provider.
â
To start with, SOC is a system of service organization controls. The acronym stands for âsystem and organization controls,â and the controls refer to a series of standards designed to help measure how well a given service organization regulates and conducts its information.Â
SOC standards exist to provide peace of mind and confidence for organizations when they work with third-party vendors. A SOC-certified organization has been audited by an independent certified public accountant.
The Service Organization Control 2 (SOC 2) Type II examination shows that an independent auditing and accounting firm has examined and reviewed an organizationâs control activities and objectives, and tested those controls to ensure that they are effectively operating.
It is based on Communications, Policies, Monitoring and Procedures.
SOC 2 Type II audits are meant to help organizations attain a reasonable level of confidence that their service providers comply with the applicable privacy and security standards, and that their systems are being operated efficiently and effectively.
With SOC 2 Type II examination, customers of service providers can evaluate the processing activities of service providers that have an impact on the security, confidentiality, processing integrity, and availability of the customerâs information.
And for the service providers, SOC 2 Type II examination helps them to understand the adequacy of their controls and in the demonstration of conformity with the applicable privacy and security standards.
The entities responsible for performing the SOC 2 Type are known as "qualified security assessors" (QSAs) and AICPA maintains the standards that govern SOC 2 Type II examinations.
Before SOC 2, the main auditing service organizationsâ standard was referred to as SAS 70 (Statement of Auditing Standards No. 70). These audits were done by Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) with the main intent of reporting on the effectiveness of internal financial controls. These started in the early 1990s.
With time, the audit was being used as a way of reporting on the effectiveness of an organizationâs internal controls around information security more deeply.
Sometime in 2010, the AICPA (The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) introduced SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports with the primary purpose of addressing the increasing need of companies to externally validate and communicate the state of their security.
Today, SOC 1 reports focus on controls that have an impact on financial reports. On the other hand, SOC 2 reports are written on audits against the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) standard. This is an ideal standard if youâre looking for a way to simultaneously grow your companyâs maturity around business processes and security.
â
SOC 2 Type I reports detail the suitability and design of the companyâs controls, its scope, and its management at a given point in time. It demonstrates proof of compliance with the American Institute of Public Accountants (AICPA) and other recognized accounting bodiesâ auditing procedures and industry best practices. This benefits companies by assuring potential customers that their data will be safe in the hands of a SOC II compliant company. Â
There has been increased demand for SOC 2 Type I compliant providers as cyber-attacks continue to rise in frequency and sophistication. While not legally required, SOC 2 Type I compliance is highly sought after for companies handling customer data like healthcare providers and financial institutions to assure their customers that they have protective controls in place.
Depending on how well a company is prepared for their SOC 2 Type I, they can be audited immediately, and the report created. If a service organization has already performed a readiness assessment, has its controls in place, and is well documented, and the approved auditor can begin the examination right away.Â
Generating the SOC 2 Type I report typically takes between 2 to 4 weeks, unlike the SOC 2 Type II report, which takes 6 months to a year â making the SOC 2 Type I report is ideal for companies assessing multiple potential vendors or looking to engage 3rd parties in a relatively short amount of time. Â
Like the SOC 2 Type I report, the type II report is a description of a companyâs system and the suitability of the design of controls, but it also assesses the operating effectiveness of said controls. While there are many benefits to SOC Type I compliance, SOC Type II provides a much higher level of assurance in comparison.    Â
To achieve SOC type II compliance, a company must pass a thorough examination of its policies and controls over an extended period, requiring companies to dedicate even more time and resources. Most companies will select a period that overlaps the most with the companyâs financial year. While there is no required minimum duration for the type II reporting period, the AICPA has suggested companies use a period of 6 months. To provide their clients with a continuous flow of reporting on their controls, companies usually decide in a 12-month reporting period to eliminate a break in the reporting period. Â
The SOC 2 Type II compliance and reporting demonstrate superior data security and control systems to potential customers. Companies with SOC 2 Type II compliance gain an advantage from the ability to engage larger, and more security-conscious organizations with their services.  Â
SOC 2 Type II compliance is follows the same general principles of SOC type I but requires additional resources and working hours. SOC 2 Type II compliance easier to acquire for companies with mature controls that are constantly monitored and updated accordingly. The SOC 2 Type II audit is generally sought out by medium to large who operate with sensitive data or in heavily regulated industries with stringent security requirements.Â
SOC 2 certification is issued by external auditors. They examine the level to which a vendor has complied with one or more of the five trust principles based on the processes and systems in place.
The trust principles are further broken down below:
1. Security
The security principle has to do with the protection of system resources against unapproved access. Access controls help avoid potential system abuse, theft or unapproved removal of data, abuse of software, and inappropriate alteration or disclosure of information.
IT security tools like network and web application firewalls (WAFs), two-factor authentication, multi-factor authentication and intrusion detection are handy in preventing security breaches that can result in unauthorized access of systems and data.
2. Availability
The availability principle refers to the availability of the system, services, or products as stipulated by a service level agreement (SLA) or contract. Hence, the minimum level of performance thatâs acceptable for system availability is set by both parties.
This principle does not include system usability and functionality but involves security-related criteria that may affect availability. Monitoring network availability and performance, site failover, and security incident handling are critical here.
3. Processing integrity
The processing integrity principle has to do with whether a system achieves its purpose or not (i.e., delivers the right data where it should be and at the right time). As a result, data processing must be valid, complete, accurate, authorized, and timely.
Nevertheless, processing integrity does not always mean data integrity. If data contains errors before it is entered into the system, detecting them is usually not the responsibility of the processing entity. Monitoring of data processing, as well as quality assurance procedures, can help ensure processing integrity.
4. Confidentiality
Data is considered confidential if its access and disclosure are limited to a specified set of individuals or organizations. Examples may include data meant only for company personnel, and also business plans, internal price lists, intellectual properties, and other types of sensitive financial information.
Encryption is a critical control for the protection of confidentiality in the course of transmission. Network and application firewalls, in combination with rigorous access controls, can be used to protect information being stored or processed on computer systems.
5. Privacy
The privacy principle deals with the systemâs collection, use, disclosure, retention, and disposal of personal information to conform with an organizationâs privacy notice, and in line with criteria outlined in the AICPAâs generally accepted privacy principles (GAPP).
Personally identifiable information (PII) is the details that can uniquely distinguish an individual (e.g., name, address, Social Security number). Some personal data related to health, sexuality, race, and religion are also considered sensitive and usually require an additional level of protection. There must be controls in place to protect all PII from unauthorized access.
Majorly, SOC 2 compliance will let you have peace of mind that your processes and procedures correspond with what they say: protect your customersâ data. Apart from this, there are two additional benefits:
More SaaS companies are getting SOC 2-certified to gain users' trust and protect their data. A good example is an Intercom that announced that they are SOC 2 compliant. Intercom is developed as a platform to ease the way B2C messaging is exchanged.
One of their business goals is to develop innovative products, but they want to also make sure their customers can trust these products. In line with SOC 2 compliance, Intercom intends to conduct annual reviews to ensure their procedures are adequate to protect customer data and that they consistently meet the needs and expectations of customers.
SaaS providers depend on their customers to help them grow. Irrespective of how creative and cutting edge the products are; if customers are not confident in the fact that their data is safe, they wonât sign up. The commitment of companies to security, processing integrity, availability, confidentiality, and privacy will determine business success. In summary, SOC 2 compliance serves as a link between tech innovation and developing trusting relationships with customers.
Letâs closely examine additional reasons why SOC 2 compliance matters
There are two kinds of SOC 2 reports: Type I and Type II. Type I reports donât take much time to make preparations for and obtain because they only focus on how well youâve done at setting up standard procedures for your business. For instance, Type I reports will check to see if your procedures can take care of issues such as data breaches. Type I reports donât check whether these procedures work, just examine to know you have a plan. Also, Type I audits only check for compliance at one point in time.
On the other hand, Type II audits do not only ensure that your procedures are in place, but that they work and are supported for some time (for example, six months).Â
The process of auditing to get this level of certification is more stricter and meticulous than Type I, but it comes with greater benefits.Â
According to a SaaS management platform known as Blissfully, Type II audits are âmore valuable in the hands of customers, prospects, board members, partners, insurance companies, and so on.â To have third-party auditors come to terms with the fact that your data security measures meet a high standard is pretty significant. Companies are much more likely to be interested in investing and doing business with you.
Although there are five trust-service principles, SaaS companies arenât expected to use all of them to protect data. For instance, if a SaaS business is mainly focused on storing data, safeguarding systems from unauthorized access is their priority. Hence, their SOC 2 audit will focus on Security Principle.
Before your SOC 2-compliance audit commences, think of how the five criteria relate to your business practices. Then decide which areas youâll concentrate on. Check out the following examples:
Think of what your customers want from you, and the most relevant principles to you become clearer to you. For instance, find out whether customers are interested in access to features such as data recovery, end-to-end encryption or two-factor authentication for their end-users. The answers will tell you which principles to concentrate on.
For instance, when Auth0 went for their SOC 2 report, they considered what their customers wanted from them. They discovered that customers wanted to be assured of two things:
So, Auth0 chose Security and Availability as the two principles they needed to be audited on to get their SOC Type II report.
By the way, Auth is an authentication and authorization platform.
Implementing new security controls can be tough. People may complain about the extra time it takes to log in to services using multi-factor authentication. However, the minor annoyances are worth the outcome. When it comes to building a secure and compliant company culture, the smaller and younger you are as an organization when new processes are put in place, the easier it will be to scale. Companies that are as small as three employees have gone through SOC 2 audits. It is also helpful to automate these processes as much as possible, baking them deep into your company culture.
Itâs never too early to get your documentation in order. Do you have policies and procedures? Do you have internal standards documentation? Having these processes well-documented will improve internal communication and consistency, which in turn enables you to meet legal and compliance challenges, close more sales, and prepare for financial changes like a merger or acquisition or a new round of VC funding.
Finally, preparing for a SOC 2 audit will give you a framework for acknowledging and mitigating risks. Many organizations that have not undergone a formal compliance audit are either unaware of security risks or addressing them in an ad hoc way. Approaching compliance systematically instead will ensure that even risks that arenât top of mind receive attention and can be mitigated in a timely manner.
â
If you donât have SOC 2 compliance as a vendor, you will probably have to fill out more than a few security questionnaires before you can work with any enterprise-scale customers. While that might sound easier than a SOC 2 audit on the surface, the questionnaires can be quite detailed and overwhelming, and they are often hard to fill out if you donât already know the security lingo, have tooling in place, and know-how to document processes. In other words, if you havenât already gone through the process of setting up and enforcing policies as you would for SOC 2, you may find yourself stuck when the questionnaires arrive.
In a nutshell, being SOC 2 compliant will both help you sell to the enterprise, and force you to follow a set of strong best practices when it comes to keeping your companyâs and customersâ data safe. Security is (or at least should be) a major concern for all technology-focused companies today, as weâve written about in our previous eBook: Blissfullyâs Practical Guide to People-First SaaS Security. Achieving SOC 2 compliance is a good way to demonstrate that you do indeed have security at heart in all you do as an organization.
â
Continued about SOCÂ 2 Type 2 and SOCÂ 2 audit in the second part
Subscribe for the latest news